#GREATSWORD DMG 5E HOW TO#

#GREATSWORD DMG 5E HOW TO#

I think this would indicate that the Fighter has not trained well on their way to their class features, and I don't think it is realistic for a trained Fighter to intentionally fight as if they do not know how to use their weapon correctly or as if they are physically impaired. I think it is problematic for an able person to try to use a weapon designed to be wielded with two hands with only one hand.

However, I do have a suggestion for how to steer the player to an idea that may satisfy their character concept while offering better roleplaying opportunities and a better mechanical balance. It is simpler to say 'no, pick a different weapon' or 'no, that character concept isn't viable' than to create the exception for them. Given the slippery slope problems, I don't see a good reason to support 'rule of cool' in this instance. If you establish the precedent that weapon properties and other game rules can be ignored for flavor as long as the results are mechanically identical, you run the risk of confusing and alienating other players and muddying the rules of the game. If any other player wants to use 'rule of cool' to wield a weapon with the Two-Handed property in one hand, it wouldn't be fair to deny them, so any of the above concerns could apply to multiple players. You would need to decide why the player can no longer benefit from the Two-Handed weapon property or else why they can bypass the restrictions of the Two-Handed weapon property when nobody else can. Suppose that the fighter loses an arm in the future during heroic combat while fighting with a Two-Handed sword wielded in the other arm.

(This is debatable, depending on how you rule on somatic components when using two-handed weapons: more on that here.) If the player eventually wants to subclass into Eldritch Knight or otherwise cast spells, you may run into problems with somatic components. If the player wants to use an object on their turn in a fashion that requires an action, such as opening a heavy door or turning a crank, you may encounter issues with the action economy where the player can do more in a turn and be prepared for upcoming opportunity attacks than another player might. If the player eventually decides they would like to use a shield, you couldn't let them wield it in their empty hand without violating the Two-Handed property of the weapon, and that creates a weird dissonance between narrative and mechanics. What your player is asking for is the benefits of a Two-Handed weapon (higher maximum damage and more consistent rolls due to the normalizing effect of the two dice) without the drawbacks of a Two-Handed weapon (occupying both hands at the same time), but the system already has Versatile weapons to fill that niche.Р”Р„lthough the player seems to be forfeiting the mechanical benefits and opting for flavor instead, and although I'm not suggesting the player will intentionally try to abuse this, I think it can lead to a slippery slope of unwanted interactions later on. It seems the designers intended these weapon properties to enhance game balance. A weapon with the Versatile property can be wielded in one or two hands with varying damage. This isn't RAW, and I would discourage it.Р”Р„ weapon with the Two-Handed property must be wielded with two hands to make an attack. That said, ruling it as a pure improvised weapon (1d4 damage, no proficiency bonus) also makes a lot of sense, since it's not made to be wielded like that.

It's slightly better then a wooden chair in terms of damage, gives them no special weapon traits and allows them to use their proficiency bonus. Normal range of 20 feet and a long range of 60 feet.Р”Р„s with most rulings, it's up to you to make the call as to whether a greatsword wielded in one hand is close enough to another weapon to be considered one. Weapon to make a melee attack, or throws a melee weapon that does not have the thrown property, it also deals ld4 damage. According to the rules on page 147-148 of the Player's Handbook:Р”Р„t the DM's option, a character proficient with a weapon can use a similar object as if it were that weapon and use his or her proficiency bonus.Р”Р„n object that bears no resemblance to a weapon deals 1d4 damage (the DM assigns a damage type appropriate to the object). How it affects damage and accuracy depends on how you view the greatsword. You can technically wield anything as a weapon, as long as it could conceivably do damage.

Greatsword dmg 5e